|
AI + PRODUCT — DAILY BRIEF
Ship Agents, Meter Tokens, and Build Context‑First AI
Fri, Jan 30, 2026
This morning: agentic governance, spreadsheet UIs for AI workflows, context-first coding agents, token billing, and world‑model tradeoffs.
Today’s brief focuses on where AI stops being a model problem and becomes a product, ops, and governance problem. Practical patterns to prototype safely and scale responsibly.
|
|
1
|
Ship Agents Like You’ll Be Audited
|
|
|
Agentic AI isn’t just a better model — it’s model + connectors + orchestration. Red Hat’s MCP demos and Red Hat/OpenShift tooling frame agentic systems as a client/server integration problem: models request JSON tool calls and servers hold the credentials and deterministic code that actually run actions. That means teams must design permissions, catalogs, and auditable runtimes, not just prompts.
Operational advice repeats across security and infra voices: start read‑only, stage in sandboxes, require human approval before writes, and version both models and connector artefacts. Multi‑agent experiments show humans shift from doing execution to defining intent and auditing outputs — ship agent UIs and APIs with explicit provenance and escalation paths.
Takeaways for PMs
-
Adopt a client‑server connector pattern (MCP or equivalent) so tool integrations live behind a vetted server with least‑privilege permissions.
-
Start pilots read‑only in staging, validate JSON tool outputs, then incrementally expand permissions only after audits pass.
-
Instrument every tool call: log model id, MCP server version, request/response JSON and user who approved the action.
-
Design human checkpoints for any write action: preview, approve, and a rollback or remediation playbook.
-
Maintain a curated catalog of vetted MCP servers/agents and require signing/versioning for production deployments.
|
|
|
2
|
Spreadsheet UX For Agentic Workflows
|
|
|
Salesforce’s Agentforce Grid shows a pragmatic pattern: make agentic automation approachable by leaning on a spreadsheet metaphor—rows of data, columns that run prompts/agents, and invocable actions. That surface turns prototyping into an iterative, inspectable, human‑in‑the‑loop process that business users can run and validate.
From a PM perspective, Grid is a prototype‑to‑production bridge: validate prompts and datasets in a sheet, expose run controls and cost estimates (flex credits), and then promote validated sheets as invocable actions or APIs for scheduled workflows.
Takeaways for PMs
-
Prototype prompts and agents in a spreadsheet surface to validate across rows and edge cases before automating.
-
Design run controls (cell/row/column) and human review steps so users can iteratively fix hallucinations without bulk damage.
-
Surface pre‑run cost estimates (flex credits) and per‑run summaries to prevent surprise spend and aid ops decisions.
-
Provide JSON/export portability and templates so validated grids can be copied between sandboxes, test suites, and production orgs.
|
|
|
3
|
Build Context‑First Coding Agents
|
|
|
Context beats model size for developer and infra agents. The Cisco DevNet demo and Cloud Code examples make the same point: give agents the right files, system messages, and manifests (cloud.md / agents.md) and start in 'plan' or 'ask' modes rather than blind auto‑edit.
That product approach reduces risky auto‑changes, makes behavior reproducible across a team, and lets you offer subscription tiers that opt out of training. Mix architecture literacy into PM checklists so model choices map to latency, control, and safety requirements.
Takeaways for PMs
-
Instrument agent inputs: provide first‑class file‑attachments, system messages, and project manifests so agents get the full context without copy/paste.
-
Default to a plan/ask phase and require explicit opt‑in for automatic edits in production code or infra repositories.
-
Version and surface a repo manifest (cloud.md / agents.md) as a living contract that agents read to behave consistently across machines.
-
Offer 'do‑not‑train' subscription options or private‑hosting paths for customers with strict provenance or compliance needs.
-
Map model architecture properties (per author notes) to product constraints — include engineers in model‑selection vetting for latency/cost tradeoffs.
|
|
|
4
|
Meter The Machine: Tokens, Flex Credits, And Billing Controls
|
|
|
Token and credit economics are a core product risk. SecOps practitioners warn token‑heavy workflows (large context, long chaining, detection‑engineering CI runs) quickly blow up API bills. Salesforce’s Grid uses 'flex credits' and ties cost to per‑run model and token usage — a model that forces PMs to think about per‑action pricing and visibility.
The shared refrain: model choice, run frequency, and choreography (combine vs split prompts) directly affect unit economics. Treat billing controls, telemetry, and pre‑run estimates as product features, not ops afterthoughts.
Takeaways for PMs
-
Model per‑call cost into acceptance criteria and roadmap ROI estimates for any AI feature.
-
Build token telemetry, pre‑run cost estimates, and per‑user caps/alerts before rolling out usage to teams.
-
Encourage combining prompt steps where sensible to reduce duplicate token consumption; surface tradeoffs in the UI.
-
Prefer subscription/team plans with known SLAs and training opt‑out when governance or predictability matters.
-
Log per‑run model/version IDs and token counts to tie cost back to feature owners and experiments.
|
|
|
5
|
World Models: Prototype Creativity, Production Brittleness
|
|
|
Genie 3 demos (Project Genie) show a new class of creator experiences: sketch → generate → explore → remix. They unlock rapid prototyping and shareable artifacts, but prototypes show clear limits—latency, short session caps, imperfect avatar control and inconsistent mid‑generation editing.
Domain applications (e.g., Togal AI for construction) expose a different lesson: world models plus perception are powerful only when grounded in domain data and human oversight. For high‑cost domains, combine CV perception, structured data, and conservative agentic outputs with editable UIs and long roadmaps.
Takeaways for PMs
-
Prototype world features with tight session limits and preview steps (sketch previews) to reduce wasted compute and set clear expectations.
-
Instrument hallucination and fidelity metrics (latency, divergence from sketch, control responsiveness) from day one.
-
Constrain world models in domain products: couple perception (CV) and structured tags before handing outputs to reasoning agents.
-
Design editable overlays and correction UIs for domain experts so humans remain 'captain' for high‑cost decisions.
-
Plan multi‑year roadmaps for full end‑to‑end domain automation — short demos show potential, not immediate production readiness.
|
|
Ship small, instrument everything, and treat agentic features as integration + governance problems before they become a compliance headline.
|
|
You’re receiving this because you subscribed to the AI + Product daily brief.
|
|